麻豆传媒

Read time: 3-minute article

Do risk-control indices work? History says yes

This content is categorized as:

Fixed indexed annuities (FIAs) are an increasingly popular option for retirees and others seeking both the stability of principal protection from market loss and the potential for growth linked to an underlying index. In 2023, another record year for annuity sales, FIA sales rose 20 percent from the year before.*

Optimize FIA outcomes with custom indices

Download our exclusive Custom Index Strategy Guides for compelling evidence about how these powerful indices can help:

  • Manage market volatility
  • Enhance participation rates
  • Offer potentially better returns

Get your strategy guides

Evidence supporting risk-control indices

The custom indices offered in most FIAs sold today include a risk control mechanism, giving the index the ability to respond to volatility. While relatively new (the risk control feature was introduced in the early 2000s) a study by The Index Standard, in partnership with 麻豆传媒, looking at 122 years of back tested data confirms the value of this rules-based approach. 

The study found that over that 122-year period, a hypothetical FIA that included a risk-controlled custom index generally would have provided higher returns than a hypothetical U.S. bond index. In fact, in many of the worst real-world market conditions between 1900 and 2022, having a risk-controlled custom index in a FIA would have improved returns compared with similar products that don鈥檛. This included the inflationary period of the 1970s and early 1980s.


Risk control for volatile times

Risk control mechanisms inside a custom index work by closely tracking the volatility of an index鈥檚 underlying assets. When volatility increases 鈥 say, during a period of market uncertainty 鈥 the risk-controlled mechanism reduces exposure to higher-risk assets and increases exposure to a lower-risk, cash-like asset. During periods of less volatility, the opposite occurs. 

To test the effectiveness of the risk-controlled mechanism, The Index Standard created a hypothetical risk-controlled Index made up of S&P 500 companies and targeting 8 percent volatility. During the 122 years studied, this risk-controlled custom index had about half the average volatility of the same index without a risk-control mechanism.

According to the research, the risk control mechanism would frequently have prevented indices from suffering the worst losses in market corrections or crashes. For example, when comparing the 10 worst drawdowns (periods from a market鈥檚 peak to trough) the risk control version had less severe drawdowns than the non-risk-control index for all 10 periods.


Accounting for risk in returns

While you get a smoother return with less severe drawdowns in a risk-controlled index, you would expect to have lower returns compared with ordinary indices. And the study confirms this: The average annualized return for the hypothetical risk control index was 7.9 percent, compared with 10.1 percent for the benchmark.

But when you consider the risk taken to achieve that higher return, the story is different. Using this measure, the long-term return for risk-controlled indices is much higher than for ordinary indices. For 10 of the 12 decades in the study鈥攕egments that are more reasonable for investors to consider than all 122 years鈥攖he hypothetical risk-controlled equity index outperformed the benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis.

So why is it important to consider risk when studying investment return potential? When you鈥檙e looking at investments for your clients, some might offer higher returns at a higher risk. You鈥檒l want to know how much risk they鈥檙e taking for the return they鈥檒l potentially receive. Having that information will help you understand whether an investment that appears to have high returns is too risky.

Once again, while absolute returns favored the ordinary U.S. equity index in the study, the Sharpe ratio was higher for the risk-controlled custom index (0.47 vs. 0.37).

The Sharpe ratio is a common metric used to assess how investments perform compared to their risk level. The higher the number, the better the return per unit of risk.


Taking a deeper look

When clients are considering annuities you鈥檒l be faced with waves of numbers. Keep in mind what your clients鈥 priorities are. Absolute returns can be important to consider, but for those nearing or in retirement who are prioritizing stability and security, the level of risk taken for that return might be even more important.

If your clients are seeking security combined with opportunities to capture growth in markets, a FIA that employs a risk-controlled custom index could provide the combination they鈥檙e seeking: stability and return at a reasonable risk.

Get more comfortable with the benefits of custom indices from the expert analysis and insights in our exclusive Custom Index Strategy Guides: Optimizing Retirement Outcomes

Insights on 麻豆传媒 Connect. Tips, tools and resources to grow your business by helping clients retire with confidence.

*.
漏 2024 麻豆传媒. All Rights Reserved.

Material in the INDEX INSIGHTS whitepapers includes research commissioned by 麻豆传媒 and conducted by The Index Standard.

Indexed annuities are not stock market investments and do not directly participate in any stock or equity investments. Market indices may not include dividends paid on the underlying stocks, and therefore may not reflect the total return of the underlying stocks; neither an index nor any market-indexed annuity is comparable to a direct investment in the equity markets.

The S&P 500 Index (the 鈥淚ndex鈥) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or its affiliates (鈥淪&P DJI鈥) and has been licensed for use by 麻豆传媒 Annuity and Life Company (鈥溌槎勾解). S&P, S&P 500, SPX, US 500, The 500, iBoxx, iTraxx and CDX are trademarks of S&P Global, Inc. or its affiliates (鈥淪&P鈥); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (鈥淒ow Jones鈥). 麻豆传媒鈥檚 products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P DJI, Dow Jones, S&P, or their respective affiliates, and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of the Index.